Tuesday, June 8, 2010

When the legend becomes fact...

"This is the West, sir. When the legend becomes fact, print the legend."
-The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance

One of the great lines in cinema and I couldn't help thinking of it as I read an article from the July 1949 issue of Zane Grey's Western Magazine. "The Hickok Legend" by Carl Smith touches on Georg Ward Nichols who had a similar line of thinking. Nichols, along with J.W. Buel, did more to contribute to building the Wild Bill legend--besides the source himself--than just about anybody else.

From ZGWM:

Though Nichols found it difficult to believe some of the stories, he tells us, when he came face to face with this superman of the frontier he "remembered the story in the Bible, where we are told that Samson 'with the jawbone of an ass slew a thousand men,' and as I looked upon this magnificent example of human strength and daring, he appeared to me to realize the powers of a Samson and Hercules combined, and I should not have been inclined to place any limits upon his achievements."
Have we progressed beyond telling tall-tales? Hardly.

I've just discovered Ron Scheer's marvelous Buddies in the Saddle blog where he reviewed the 1995 Jeff Bridge's film WILD BILL. Like me, though he appreciated Mr. Bridges's acting and the opening of the film, the numerous historical inaccuracies once Hickok reaches Deadwood--his Waterloo--do the film in.

It proves to me that one hundred thirty-four years after James Butler Hickok's passing we are still printing the legend and always will because that's what folks have come to expect, isn't it?

9 comments:

  1. Legends speak to us on the deep, emotional level. They feed our need to believe in something, anything, that is greater than ordinary.
    Facts build us. Legends make us.

    ReplyDelete
  2. History is so subjective it's pretty much all legend. It's just a matter of degree.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Eventually the legend becomes more true than the truth.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sometimes the truth is so hard to believe, fiction itself seems less contrived.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thx for the plug. As for your question, we need fiction to get at the truth because facts by themselves are way too confusing. If I were a cognitive psychologist, I could probably give you a better answer than that.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Accuracy is only occasionally required in Hollywood, I fear. And Westerns probably got ruined by whatever the felt like saying the most often.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Ron, For an amateur cognitive psychologist, that's not bad.

    Glad to link. You have a top site.

    ReplyDelete
  8. It is easier to believe if we can subconsciencly tie something we've heard all our life into it. Cool post!

    ReplyDelete